Re: libtool and 32/64-bit builds

[Albert Chin]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 06:53:38PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Albert Chin wrote:
> 
> > > What I make of it is that you didn't specify a -R option to find the
> > > library, so ld.so looks in a system directory instead.  This has
> > > nothing to do with 32 vs 64 bit.
> >
> > If -R was not included on the command-line, I should have received a
> > '(file not found)' string in the ldd output. Consider the following:
> 
> Not necessarily so.  Since libz.so is a standard system library in
> Solaris 9, it is found by default.  A -R is not required unless you
> want it to use yours rather than the system's equivalent.

If that is the case, why did I get '(file not found)' when creating a
32-bit object file? I should have received the same result, regardless
of creating a 32-bit or 64-bit object file.

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)