[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64bit HPUX problems
From: |
John David Anglin |
Subject: |
Re: 64bit HPUX problems |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:40:14 -0400 (EDT) |
> >Hmmm. Thought the "w" referred to the W bit in the PSW being set to 1.
> No. The "w" merely means the OS is capable of running code in wide mode
> (PSW bit set to 1).
I would argue that the code architecture is in fact different when the
PSW W bit is set to 1 (e.g., assemble_16, assemble_16a, add and branch
instruction conditions in table D-8, and addressing).
> >The HP compiler has separate options to set the architecture and data
> >model, although they are far from independent.
> Yes, as does GCC. What's your point?
I am suggesting that the two not be mixed together in the cpu portion
of configuration triplets.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin address@hidden
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, (continued)
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, ross . alexander, 2002/08/13
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, ross . alexander, 2002/08/13
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, Albert Chin, 2002/08/13
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, Albert Chin, 2002/08/13
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, John David Anglin, 2002/08/13
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, John David Anglin, 2002/08/13
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, Jeff Law, 2002/08/14
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, John David Anglin, 2002/08/14
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, Jeff Law, 2002/08/14
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems,
John David Anglin <=
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, Jeff Law, 2002/08/14
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, John David Anglin, 2002/08/14
- Re: 64bit HPUX problems, John David Anglin, 2002/08/14