[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in libtoolize
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in libtoolize |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:55:59 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041103) |
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> > I question that we can rely on tar being installed, although I have not
> > come across a system where it isn't.
>
> Maybe I should add a --no-tar option to fallback to 'cp -p'
> to cover that eventuality?
I take it back. GCS allows us to rely on a tar command being available.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, (continued)
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Peter O'Gorman, 2005/02/16
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Brian Barrett, 2005/02/16
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Peter O'Gorman, 2005/02/16
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Peter O'Gorman, 2005/02/16
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Albert Chin, 2005/02/17
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Jeff Squyres, 2005/02/18
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Peter O'Gorman, 2005/02/21
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/02/21
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Peter O'Gorman, 2005/02/21
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/02/21
- Re: Bug in libtoolize,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Jeff Squyres, 2005/02/24
- Re: Bug in libtoolize, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/02/24