|
From: | Peter Rosin |
Subject: | Re: pr-msvc-support merge |
Date: | Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:35:45 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
Hi Ralf, Den 2010-06-12 10:05 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:49:18AM CEST:The above may sound as if I'm opposed to moving the script to automake, but I'm not. I'm mostly afraid of the script ending up where the cccl script - or should I say script_s_ - ended up.Well, I sort of figured that the 'compile' script could end up absorbing quite a bit of the cccl functionality so to make it unneeded. But hey, let's be honest, somebody would have to do this work, because I don't have the resources to do it.
Do you think something along these lines would be acceptable? It would remove the need of some patches on the pr-msvc-support branch... Is it perhaps time for me to assign copyright for automake changes? Cheers, Peter
cl-wrapper.patch
Description: Text document
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |