[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Accidentals Patch 1.5.24

From: Rune Zedeler
Subject: Re: Accidentals Patch 1.5.24
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 19:09:25 +0100

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> The interface of gh_assoc and these other functions is different: with
> gh_assoc you get the handle back (or #f it's not there). With the
> function you write, you get some default value back when the key is
> not there.

Yes, but I still need to get the handle back if it IS there - just like
in gh_alloc...
Well, would it be alright that I also add a ly_alloc behaving just like
gh_alloc except that it returns SCM_EOL instead if SCM_BOOL_F when it
doesn't succed?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]