[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature
From: |
Juergen Reuter |
Subject: |
Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2002 16:44:54 +0200 (CEST) |
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Another aspect when it comes to mensural notation is that
> it is fairly common to change to shorter note values when
> doing modern editions of the old manuscripts. See for example
> some of the pieces in the editions of the music by Thomas
> Ravenscroft at http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/ravenscroft/modern/
>
Exactly. That's the purpose of transcription-shift in my proposal.
> You may want to print both a scholarly edition and a performance
> edition from the same Lilypond definition of the music.
Right. So far, I already succeeded in doing this for mensural ligatures,
see input/test/mensural-ligatures.ly on how I did it for ligatures.
Greetings,
Juergen
- Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, (continued)
- Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Han-Wen, 2002/05/20
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Rune Zedeler, 2002/05/21
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Juergen Reuter, 2002/05/22
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Han-Wen, 2002/05/22
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Han-Wen, 2002/05/22
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Laura Conrad, 2002/05/23
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Juergen Reuter, 2002/05/24
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/05/24
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Laura Conrad, 2002/05/24
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/05/24
- Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature,
Juergen Reuter <=