Re: i18n 2nd time

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Addendum: this is mostly correctly done in lily. 
> 
> ... in lilypond-1.4.0.  Don't know what happened after.
> 
> > Just did this.  -- It seems that gettext chokes on multi-line string
> > literals, spewing complaints about non-terminated string literals.
> 
> Multiline string literals are not valid C/C++.  Gcc 3.x will warn (or
> barf, whatever you want) on this.

1. Multiline string literals are valid in Python

2. I think that this is one the stupidest C++ decisions I've seen in
   years. So much for in-line literate programming.  I guess we'll
   have to use snarfing scripts once again.

-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/