[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] a few misc refman things (resubmitted)
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: [patch] a few misc refman things (resubmitted) |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Sep 2002 11:48:51 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> On Thu, 05 Sep 2002 17:57:13 +0200
> J <address@hidden> wrote:
> > GP> Now for this patch. Adds a short warning that \slurUp won't affect
> > GP> phrasing slurs (thanks to Atte Andre Jensen for that suggestion), and
> > GP> also a warning that if you want \slurUp to affect a \grace note, the
> > GP> \slurUp has to be inside the \grace.
> >
> > It would have been wise to talk about \phrasingSlurUp, et al. (which does
> > exist). The newbie this all done for won't understand anything that's
> > written in the Lilypond Internals.
>
> Thanks; I didn't realize that.
>
> Changelog:
> 2002-09-14 Graham Percival <address@hidden>
>
> * Documentation/user/refman.itely: warns that \slurFoo doesn't affect
> phrasing slurs, and warns that a warning that if you want \slurUp to
> affect a grace note, the \slurUp must be inside the \grace section.
your example is misleading. If you do
\grace {
\slurDown
c4 ( }
) c4 c4 ()
\slurBoth
you get even more interesting results.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen