Re: improved lilypond-book.py

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> Your glossary patch made me have a look at it, and I wonder about a
> few things.
> 
> The glossary is not part of the info documentation.  Should we include
> it in the lilypond manual, eg, as an appendix, or should we rename it
> (ie: lilypond-glossary, musical-glossary), and install it separately?

I think that music-glossary is a better name. I think it should not be
part of the manual itself, as a large part of it is about
music-theoretical concepts, which have no direct connection with
Lily. Hyperlinks are ok, of course, but we should have a macro to
prevent the unreadable texinfo references showing up in the printed
edition.


-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen