Re: Bug status

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> On Saturday 25 September 2004 20.36, Graham Percival wrote:
> > On 24-Sep-04, at 2:31 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > address@hidden writes:
> > >> Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the
> > >> bottom line
> > >> is way off. see attachment.
> > >
> > > There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is
> > > perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is
> > > wrong.
> >
> > Is this the problem that's in the manual section on Rehearsal marks?
> >
> > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
> > Rehearsal-marks.html
> 
> Yes, it's exactly the same.

Take a look at the regression test for part combining. Hopefully that
makes  it clear what part combining should look like.


--
 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen