[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams
From: |
Erlend Aasland |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:40:00 +0100 |
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:23:30 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> The beam hack is acceptable (we do similar things for grace notes.)
> The extra-offset isn't;
Hmm, ok... When extra-offset is set to zero, fret numbers are placed
above the strings. Some tabs use this style, but the majority of tabs
I've seen print fret numbers _on_ the strings. I think the latter
should be default, so we should have a function that compute the
offset. What is the preferred way to implement this?
Erlend
- [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Erlend Aasland, 2005/01/08
- [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/01/08
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Erlend Aasland, 2005/01/08
- Message not available
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/01/08
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams,
Erlend Aasland <=
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/01/08
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Erlend Aasland, 2005/01/08
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Erlend Aasland, 2005/01/10
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/01/10
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Erlend Aasland, 2005/01/10
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Erlend Aasland, 2005/01/10
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Erlend Aasland, 2005/01/10
- Re: [PATCH] Tablatures and beams, Phil Moors, 2005/01/12