[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:54:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> I have misunderstood something.
> So here what do you think the correct order will be for releasing the
> packages?
>
> - release lilypond packaged for tetex-2.0
> - release tetex-3
> - release ec-fonts for tetex-3, with dependency on tetex
> - release lilypond packaged for tetex-3.0
Yes, this is cleaner than the lilypond updmap hack.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, (continued)
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/19
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/20
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/21
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/26