Re: Missing CVS release tags

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:

>> Shouldn't we should distribute the script, this would have been fixed
>> a long time ago?
>
> Given that you and I are the only parties potentially using it, I
> doubt that.

I've got no ambition to become release meister.  But you might be
sorry for tempting my nit-pickyness ;-)  Mwmahahahahaaaa

I like having procedures that can be improved or fixed, esp. because
the 2.4 cycle was haunted by number of annoying hickups; missing
ChangeLog markers (interesting, I've made `make release' automagically
fix that or fail), missing tags, differences between CVS-VERSION and
tarball, patches in CVS not in tarball and vice versa I think.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org