[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: conversion batchfile or commandscript
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: conversion batchfile or commandscript |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:33:03 -0700 |
On 1-Sep-05, at 1:50 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
http://lilypond.org/mingw/lilypond-tools-2.6.0.zip
Is this still the recommended way for windows users to get
convert-ly? If so,
could we add this link to the download page?
I'm a bit reluctant to do that, since they are not built as part of
the regular release cycle (they can't be cross compiled).
Well, we should figure out how to deal with those scripts. I don't
think it's terrible
if each package has their own way of dealing with them, but we need to
document
them. This is the most frequently asked item on -user right now.
Hey,
how much interest would there be in a convert-ly web interface? We
could offer access to convert-ly a subscription plan :-)
(the same holds for etf2ly, abc2ly, etc.)
I don't know about etf2ly, but that could work well for convert-ly and
abc2ly. However,
it would need to be a true "update lilypond files", not just "run
convert-ly". ie if
convert-ly can't handle everything, you (ie the one getting the money,
not the person
paying) update it manually.
(snarky comment: hey, this might make you less eager to change the
input syntax
without updating convert-ly. ;)
This probably shouldn't be done as a subscription (instead on a per-job
basis), and
you probably aren't interested in manually updating scores. If
LilyPond had tens of
thousands of users (enough to support a full-time team of developers),
this is
something we could offer.
Cheers,
- Graham