[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Illegal C++
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: Illegal C++ |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:55:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Wiz Aus" <address@hidden> writes:
> miss the many admittedly powerful tools that are available under linux.
> But never yet have I felt the slightly bit compelled to choose to develop
> under that platform. I'm sorry, but I like my GUI's, and my single
> keystroke
> compile and debug cycles, and not to having to worry about which version
> of which package is compatible with another and why this scripting command
> works here and not there. And I'm quite obviously not the only one.
> I'm more than willing to contribue towards lilypond development, but I doubt
> I would bother if I had to do it in a linux environment.
Hrm, I run Debian and have all that wondrous stuff.
- Re: Illegal C++, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/07
- Re: Illegal C++, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/07
- Re: Illegal C++, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/07
- Re: Illegal C++, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/12
- Re: Illegal C++, Wiz Aus, 2005/10/12
- Re: Illegal C++,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- Re: Illegal C++, Wiz Aus, 2005/10/14
- Re: Illegal C++, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/14
- Re: Illegal C++, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/14
- Re: Illegal C++, Wiz Aus, 2005/10/14
- Re: Illegal C++, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/14
- Re: Illegal C++, Wiz Aus, 2005/10/15
- Re: Illegal C++, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/14
- Re: Illegal C++, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/15
- Re: Illegal C++, Pedro Kröger, 2005/10/16
- Re: Illegal C++, Erik Sandberg, 2005/10/16