|
From: | Joe Neeman |
Subject: | Re: Tremolo positioning |
Date: | Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:46:00 +1100 |
User-agent: | KMail/1.8.3 |
It seems this issue doesn't bother anyone else? In any case, now that 2.8 is out there, I thought I'd start pushing this point again. I attach a patch that gives the behaviour that I think is correct. I also attach 2 examples of the differences between the existing and the proposed behaviours. Joe On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:01, Joe Neeman wrote: > I've finally put my finger on what was bothering me about lilypond > tremolos -- they are too close to the noteheads. > > I think that the tremolo marks shouldn't depend on where the notehead > is, but rather on the position of the end of the stem. Also, the stem > should be made longer to accomodate the tremolo. For example, if I have > doubled eighth notes, the stems should be as long as if they were 16th > notes and the tremolo markings should go where the second beams would be > if they were 16th notes. > > I attach 2 scanned examples, a Schirmer edition of Franck's sonata for > violin and piano and a B&H edition of Bartok's solo violin sonata. I > also attach lilypond versions of the snippets, just for comparison. > > I also have an example (no scan of this) where lilypond makes the stems > so short that the tremolo and the notehead overlap. (Sorry for all the > images. I've tried to keep them small.) > > Joe
franck_after.jpeg
Description: JPEG image
tchaik_after.jpeg
Description: JPEG image
franck_before.jpeg
Description: JPEG image
tchaik_before.jpeg
Description: JPEG image
tremolo_20060326.patch
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |