[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: skyline vertical spacing
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: skyline vertical spacing |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:25:23 +0100 (CET) |
> > Hmm. Such skylines don't need to be too detailed -- for example,
> > in case of a sharp (#) it's sufficient IMHO to handle the top and
> > bottom as a straight line.
>
> BTW, I think maximum-slope would solve this automatically;
Ok.
> you'd get a skyline like this for sharps, which may be even better
> than using a straight line:
>
> _ _
> /|\/|\
> _/ | | \_
> /---+--+---\
> | |
> ---+--+---
> | |
> | |
Ah, I think this shows a potential problem: Consider this series:
_ _ _ _
|\ |\ |\ |\
+-\ | \ | \ | \
+- \ | \ | \
+- \ | \
+- \
If we use maximum-slope naïvely, the difference between the real
outline and the skyline can become quite large. We should probably
make the slope dependent on the vertical difference.
Werner
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, (continued)
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/11/13
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Joe Neeman, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Juergen Reuter, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Erik Sandberg, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Juergen Reuter, 2006/11/14
- Re: skyline vertical spacing, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/11/14
Re: skyline vertical spacing, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/11/13
Re: skyline vertical spacing, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/11/14
Re: skyline vertical spacing, Erik Sandberg, 2006/11/14
Re: skyline vertical spacing, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/11/14