Re: Git strategy for GDP

[Graham Percival]

Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Quoting Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>
> > There are no doc fixes going into master, and I plan on keeping it 
> > that way until 2.12 is out.
>
>
> That's important news for people like me, who occasionally keep
> fixing small things in the documentation. Should I instead do that
> in your gdp branch?

Umm, good question.  I'm not totally certain about the answer.

The big problem is that the *notation chapters are completely split up 
into separate files, so no patch to those chapters can be automatically 
applied to the GDP docs.  My initial "plan" was simply to apply any 
patch manually to GDP.

...

Yes, please patch GDP directly.  If there's something totally urgent 
that needs to go into the 2.12 docs, we can manually backport it.

Cheers,
- Graham