Re: GDP: consistency in @q @qq @samp @code

[Graham Percival]

Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > How about @address@hidden }} instead?  I think that actual input should
> > be in a monospace font, and these commands nest without problem.
>
> This is redundant -- @samp{} already produces fixed-width output.

Oops, I didn't realize that.

In that case, I don't think that @samp{cresc} (as in "@samp{crescendo} 
is often abbreviated as @samp{cresc.}") is appropriate.  I see three 
possibilities:

- @var{cresc}: prints it in italics
- @emph{cresc}: also prints in italics, but this is a generic 
"emphasize" command, instead of a specific "this is a piece of notation" 
command.
- @q{}: normal text inside single quotes.

I'm leaning towards @var{}, but I could be convinced otherwise.

Cheers,
- Graham