[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions about articulation settings for the GDP
From: |
Eyolf Østrem |
Subject: |
Re: Questions about articulation settings for the GDP |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:09:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13cvs-muttng (2007-01-26) |
On 31.10.2007 (00:14), Graham Percival wrote:
> Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> >Actually, the answer is different for different articulations. Some, like
> > \fermata
> >are always placed above the stave, whereas others like \accent are placed
> >opposite to the stem. All this is specified in the file scm/script.scm.
> Eyolf, could you include info about this in your next update of
> Expressive?
Yes. Perhaps this should be a general sub(sub)section, since it
applies to many different kinds of signs? As it is now, there are
more or less identical remarks about the "_" and "^" constructs in
"dynamics", "articulations", "Ties", "Slurs", and "Phrasing Slurs".
That's not necessarily a problem, but it might be an idea to gather
the info together and then refer very briefly to it at the relevant
places.
eyolf
--
There was this drylander who was asked which was more important, a literjon
of water or a vast pool of water? The drylander thought a moment and then
said: "The literjon is more important. No single person could own a great
pool of water. But a literjon you could hide under your cloak and run away
with it. No one would know."
-- The Jokes of Ancient Dune, Bene Gesserit Archives