Re: partcombine, but including rests from quiet voices?

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

2007/12/18, Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden>:
> > > I haven't looked closely at the patch, but judging from the description,
> > > it does exactly what I had planned to do in determine-split-list. Does
> > > anyone know why these patches never got applied? Are there any problems
> > > with them? Or was there simply not enough interest?
> >
> > IIRC the patch was supposed to fix a few small things, but was quite
> > huge. Requests for clarifications never materialized.
>
> Well, "small things"... It appeared to have fixed *the* problem that I have
> with the partcombiner, namely that even one single note (where the other
> instrument has a rest) is detected as a solo...

Yes, I understand that it's large from your perspective. However, it
would mean that we would go from a file that very few understand to a
file that noone understands.  From a maintenance perspective, that is
not a good idea.


-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen