Re: referencences for XXX

[Graham Percival]

If you check current.txt on the GDP site, you'll see that it
wasn't me.  :)

Anyway, the important question was the style, and it seems you
agree with it.  In other words, other NR 2 rewriters can look at
this as a good example of how to write their own.

Cheers,
- Graham


On Sun, 11 May 2008 09:27:41 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> wrote:

> I like the brief descriptions and refs as a bulleted list.  "Perfect"
> might be going too far, but it looks pretty good :)
> 
> The question to ask now is, is this list of refs complete - does it
> contain pointers to everything (fairly) specific to keyboards which a
> keyboard typesetter might need?  But getting the balance right is
> tricky, since otherwise we'd be adding references to everything from
> everywhere.  I think what you've done is pretty close to what we
> need. Even so, I'd like to see a ref to PianoStaff, and maybe to
> writing multiple voices, which are essential for and fairly specific
> to keyboard music.  Maybe a ref to 1.6.1.2 Grouping staves would
> cover both these.
> 
> Trevor
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
> To: "lily-devel" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 4:32 AM
> Subject: NR 2: referencences for XXX
> 
> 
> > Here's a sample "References for XXX", from NR 2.2.1.1:
> >
> > http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/References-for-keyboards.html
> >
> > - does this look perfect?  (the style, not the actual contents...
> >  although if you see any problem with the content, we wouldn't
> > mind hearing abou that)
> >
> > - should anything change?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - Graham
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> > 
>