Re: (patch proposition) note-by-number augmentation dot position

[Risto Vääräniemi]

2008/5/19 Risto Vääräniemi:

> 2008/5/17 Joe Neeman :
>
>> Sorry for the long delay. I certainly agree that the new behaviour looks
>> better. I'm a bit concerned, though, that you only use special cases for 8th
>> and 16th notes. Why not something like (< dir (+ 1 (* 0.15 (- log 2))))?
>
> Thanks for the tip. However, I tested your code and it seems that it
> moves the dot depending on the duration, i.e. for 64th notes the stem
> needs to be very long before the dot is moved.

Oops. I tried to say that the dot(s) are not moved back next to the
stem (i.e. they are not moved at all :-)) unless the stems for shorter
durations (32th & 64th) are very long.

-Risto