[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shorthand for autoBeam control
From: |
Paul Scott |
Subject: |
Re: shorthand for autoBeam control |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:55:20 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) |
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before: What do you think
> of using `c[]' as a shorthand for `\autoBeamOff c \autoBeamOn'?
>
> Currently, `c[]' produces
>
> _____
> |
> |
> O
>
> (a note with a beamlet to the left and right), which is neither
> documented nor makes much sense IMHO.
>
> My special example is this where such a shorthand would be quite
> convenient:
>
> c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16 } c8
>
This may have nothing to do with your proposal/question but as a reader
I would find your example much harder to read/sightread than
c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16] } c8
or
c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16 } c8]
Paul Scott
> (see attached image).
>
>
> Werner
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------