Re: Fw: Vocal music

[Trevor Daniels]

Valentin

Thanks for this.  I'm happy with the reorganisation in general.  As there is 
only one vocal "instrument" the standard layout for NR 2 does not apply 
here, so dropping the Common notation ... section is fine.

There will not be many References for vocal music, as pretty well all of it 
is going to be in this section, but there should be one to 
@rlearning{Songs}, which gives a gentle introduction to some of the easier 
concepts.  Maybe this should be near the top, rather than buried in section 
2.1.1.4.  Could the References be moved up?  And it certainly must not be 
removed!  Apart from the reference mentioned it should contain at least refs 
to the templates.

On formatting, please use @unnumberedsubsubsec rather than @subsubsection. 
This avoids the ugly four-element numbers and gives a better layout in html.

I'm not familiar with the suggested headword.  Let's put it up and have a 
look.

I've not pushed this, as I know nothing of translations, but I'm happy to do 
so if John says it's OK.

Trevor


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Valentin Villenave" <address@hidden>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Lily-Devel List" <address@hidden>; "John Mandereau" 
<address@hidden>; "Francisco Vila" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Vocal music


> 2008/9/30 Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>:
> > It's all yours!  Forget the opera - have some light relief!
>
> Thanks -- although working on "vocal music" is not as exotic as I'd like 
> :-)
>
> OK, here's a first patch. John, Francisco, please have a look before
> pushing; as explained in the commit's description, it might get you
> nervous. I have carefully updated the translations, but not the po
> files.
>
> Cheers,
> Valentin