Re: holdups for 2.12

[Jonathan Kulp]

Graham Percival wrote:
> If I'm correct about the above, then let's shove 2.12 out the
> door, get the post-GDP docs as the new "stable" stuff, and fix
> remaining things in .1 or .2.  (I definitely think the 2.13 docs
> should be backported for the first few months at least)
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham

Exactly what I was thinking during those interminable rants on the user 
list.  I'm not a developer but I've been using the latest devel version 
for the last year on Linux, Windows Vista (brief tests only), and Mac 
OSX 10.4.  The only issues I ever had were the speed problems you 
mentioned on Vista and those got ironed out with the 
daylight-savings-time fix.  For what it's worth, I vote "it's ready."

Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com