[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: good news for my PhD
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: good news for my PhD |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:07:00 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:09:10PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/3/18 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > That's the fun thing about logical implication. A false premise
> > logically implies any conclusion, even impossible ones.
>
> Yes but I'd call it begging the question, a fallacy
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petitio_principii
No; begging the question would be p -> p. (or q -> q)
p = "I have written source code (in the past few weeks) for lilypond"
q = "My source code is copyrightable"
We have: p -> q
I'm arguing that ~q -> ~p, which is a perfectly valid point of
boolean algebra.
(~x means "not x" -- there's more than 5 different notations for
"logical NOT", which makes life fun)
Cheers,
- Graham
Re: good news for my PhD, Valentin Villenave, 2009/03/18
Re: good news for my PhD, John Mandereau, 2009/03/19
Re: good news for my PhD, John Mandereau, 2009/03/19
Re: good news for my PhD, Valentin Villenave, 2009/03/20