[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: an LM update

From: Carl D. Sorensen
Subject: Re: an LM update
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:45:13 -0600

On 3/23/09 8:19 AM, "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> wrote:

> James E. Bailey wrote March 23, 2009 12:43 PM
>> Am 23.03.2009 um 13:24 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
>> I'd like to say that I think removing polyphony here is a viable
>> solution, but I don't really believe that. Vocal music is heavily
>> reliant on this single staff polyphony.   It's far too important
>> and  often-used concept to really not introduce in the Learning
>> Manual.
> Personally I'd prefer to either remove it, or replace it with
> something like, "The concepts required to write polyphony
> are not introduced until section 3.2."  And of course fix 3.2.

I vote for this as well.  I think in the Learning Manual we should be firm
on the policy of not introducing unexplained syntax.

It should be sufficient to give a pointer that says "we'll cover this later.
Hang on till we get there".  Then fix 3.2


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]