lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH]Re: tempoMark - documentation and use


From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Re: tempoMark - documentation and use
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:18:16 +0100

Thanks Jon - pushed to origin/master

Trevor

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Kulp" <address@hidden>
To: "Kieren MacMillan" <address@hidden>
Cc: "lilypond-devel List" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 2:32 AM
Subject: [PATCH]Re: tempoMark - documentation and use


Patch attached. It has patches for three different files so I just named it after the one with the most changes, working.itely. Hope there's no
confusion...

Jon

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Jonathan Kulp <address@hidden>wrote:

Kieren MacMillan wrote:
IMO, we [in the docs] should *not* be encouraging the use of RehearsalMarks for tempo indications -- this is exactly why the \tempo command was
rewritten [can't remember by whom at the moment, but "thanks!"].

In other words, this example should *also* be changed... maybe something
like

tempoPadded = #(define-music-function (parser location padding tempotext)
(number? string?)
#{
 \once \override Score.MetronomeMark #'padding = $padding
 \tempo \markup { \bold $tempotext }
#})

Jon,


 Yes!  I'll change this one accordingly.


Thanks,
Kieren.


I've also changed it in the "scheme tutorial" section of the LM. Thanks for writing this snippet, Kieren. A patch will come once I've sorted out the
"mpdolce" definition.


Jon

--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com




--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]