|
From: | Trevor Daniels |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH]Re: tempoMark - documentation and use |
Date: | Wed, 13 May 2009 11:18:16 +0100 |
Thanks Jon - pushed to origin/master Trevor----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Kulp" <address@hidden>
To: "Kieren MacMillan" <address@hidden> Cc: "lilypond-devel List" <address@hidden> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 2:32 AM Subject: [PATCH]Re: tempoMark - documentation and use
Patch attached. It has patches for three different files so I just named it after the one with the most changes, working.itely. Hope there's noconfusion... JonOn Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Jonathan Kulp <address@hidden>wrote:Kieren MacMillan wrote:IMO, we [in the docs] should *not* be encouraging the use of RehearsalMarks for tempo indications -- this is exactly why the \tempo command wasrewritten [can't remember by whom at the moment, but "thanks!"].In other words, this example should *also* be changed... maybe somethingliketempoPadded = #(define-music-function (parser location padding tempotext)(number? string?) #{ \once \override Score.MetronomeMark #'padding = $padding \tempo \markup { \bold $tempotext } #})I've also changed it in the "scheme tutorial" section of the LM. Thanks for writing this snippet, Kieren. A patch will come once I've sorted out theJon, Yes! I'll change this one accordingly.Thanks, Kieren."mpdolce" definition. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com-- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |