[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: two patches
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: two patches |
Date: |
Wed, 27 May 2009 20:17:10 +0200 |
2009/5/27 Carl D. Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> a) The changes to Documentation/de/* that move Lilypond -> LilyPond are OK
> to commit, even though the commitish in the header of this file won't be
> updated.
In particular, updating the committish for a file that is not up to
date, would mark it as updated. Bad for the translator, who would lost
the notice of pending changes from the originals.
Otherwise, if you are sure that a file is bleedingly up to date,
updating its committish would save work to the translator, because he
does not have to worry for the file as it would not appear in our list
of pendant work (only to realize that there is no work to do)
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org