|
From: | Ian Hulin |
Subject: | Re: better error msg for ambiguous (de)crescendo? |
Date: | Thu, 28 May 2009 11:21:48 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) |
Hi Mark, WernerThe most important thing about these errors is that they can _always_ be traced back to a source line so is it possible to word the error something like:
warning: lilypond cannot interpret a (de)crescendo. MIDI output ignoring (de)crescendo starting at line <nnnn>.This way the diagnostic states why Lily can't do what the user has coded, what it's doing as a result, and the consequences of the error condition detected.
Cheers, Ian Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Here are my candidates: "warning: impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo." "warning: impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo (MIDI)." "warning: ignoring impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo." "warning: ignoring impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo (MIDI)." "warning: MIDI found an impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo." "warning: MIDI is ignoring an impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo." Anyone care to vote, suggest an alternative, or express an opposition to this idea?What about warning: MIDI: impossible or ambiguous (de)crescendo: ignored It looks horrible from a grammatical point of view, but it probably makes scanning through log files easier. Werner
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |