[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:14:46 -0700 |
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
>> to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made
>> with an updated GUB version (it now ships Ghostscript 8.65). Please
>> have a ride and tell me if there are problems. It did run
>> successfully under WINE.
>
> It does not include fixes to 739 and 759 from Friday.
>
> On Linux i386, ps file is generated but not converted to pdf.
>
> Log says
>
> Converting to `./test.pdf'...
> `gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841.89
> -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite
> -sOutputFile="./test.pdf" -c .setpdfwrite -f "test.ps"' failed (256)
I can reproduce this here (with GNU/Linux 32-bit). Attached is the
output I get with `lilypond -V'.
-Patrick
pdf-creation-failure.log
Description: Binary data
Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Francisco Vila, 2009/06/03
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up,
Patrick McCarty <=
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/03
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/06/03
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/03
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Paul Scott, 2009/06/04
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Paul Scott, 2009/06/04
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/05
- Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up, Francisco Vila, 2009/06/05