[PATCH] should it be @code{\\addInstrumentDefinition} ?

[Mark Polesky]

In a patch I submitted some days ago...
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blobdiff;f=ly/music-functions-init.ly;h=1910975f7fdc81ff7e3632d766f396a631f62f06;hp=2dded22e3d77acd2b2dbcab500d6a01a5f893be9;hb=269248a11ada074066deb061d64df70ee7b4deec;hpb=53c3276a6d56cf8866f7f813d8b53f639bd6b073

I made this change in music-functions-init.ly:

address@hidden")
address@hidden")

Though the lilypond.org docs haven't been updated since, I see
now that the change has made it to Reinhold's docs:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Overview-of-available-music-functions.html#index-instrumentSwitch-2

However, the \a is still showing up as a control character 0x07,
which I'm assuming means "alarm"? It's listed as "bell" here:
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/0007/index.htm

The html source also reads (with character 0x07 after <code>):
  <code>ddInstrumentDefinition</code>


So, I'm sorry for the misstep, but I don't see why this happens.
By comparison, I grepped for @code{\a and found this example in
user/vocal.itely, line 168:

by the keyword @code{\lyricmode}, or by using @code{\addlyrics} or

which looks fine in the docs:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Entering-lyrics.html#Lyrics-explained

Can someone explain why it works in one file but not in the other?
I can patch a fix, but I'm not sure the right way to do it. I'm
guessing it's as simple as this:

address@hidden")
address@hidden")

And if it is, here's the patch.

Thanks.
- Mark

0001-code-addInstrumentDefinition-code-addInstrumentDefin.patch
Description: Binary data