[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: some sort of suppress-accidental? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:17:34 -0700 (PDT) |
Neil Puttock wrote:
> > do you think remove-accidental would be more semantically
> > accurate than hide-accidental?
>
> Not particularly, since that implies that it exists in the
> first place.
By that logic, I would think prevent- or suppress- would be
more accurate.
- Mark
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, (continued)
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/06/18
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Ted Walther, 2009/06/18
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/17
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Graham Percival, 2009/06/17
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/17
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/17
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/17
- Re: some sort of suppress-accidental?,
Mark Polesky <=