Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

[Mark Polesky]

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > I also took a look at the next procedure,
> > split-list-by-separator. My revised version is below. Unless I
> > hear otherwise, I'll send a patch soon.
>
> Maybe you guys can look into making a test framework for the
> Scheme library functions.
>
> It should be fairly simple to check the functions (like you do
> here ad-hoc) in a separate .scm file that is loaded if you run
> ly/test-scm-functions.ly or something similar.

Han-Wen,

I don't mean to be obtuse, but I don't quite understand what you
mean. What's a test framework? Do you mean "library" as in 
lily-library, or SRFI library? By check, do you mean test/compare
results, or access, as in checkout?

Is it the define-public that bothers you? Sorry for being so
confused. But I do want to understand you clearly before I go out
on a limb, er... branch.

Thanks.
- Mark