[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:48:44 +0200 (CEST) |
> Alternatively, a new .scm file (similar to define-grobs.scm or
> define-grob-interfaces.scm) could be created: define-predicates.scm.
> This would define an alist of predicate types and predicates, and
> any predicates that were found by your routine and were not included
> in the define-predicates alist would be classified as "Other" or
> "Unknown".
To me, this sounds like the right and probably easiest way to go.
Werner
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, (continued)
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/24
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/29
- type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Neil Puttock, 2009/06/30
- [PATCH] define-grobs.scm: Alphabetize grob list. (was: Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/29
- Re: [PATCH] define-grobs.scm: Alphabetize grob list. (was: Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/30