Re: New website: Logos

[Mark Polesky]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> So, instead, we can say that, *if* anyone should complain
> 
>   - users are greatly helped by/need clear image logos
>   - every single project has it's own unreadable legalese
>     and we cannot afford the time and money to get a lawyer
>     go over this
>   - it strikes us that these legalese are in place to prevent
>     misuse/slander etc, and *not* to slow down other free software
>     projects, or hinder other free software (*your*) users?
>   - we still feel that the way we use all logos, is a helpful,
>     respectful and most probably the best possible way we can
>     do it.
>   - what would help us, is if *you* had some page up, not with
>     what we cannot do, but rather with helpful examples of what
>     we *can* do.  please point us to the logo you want us to
>     use and we'll replace it asap, thanks!
> 

Jan,
why do we need the logos anyway? Can you point me to other
open-source projects that do this? I can't find any.

http://download.openoffice.org/other.html#en-US
http://gimp.org/downloads/
http://www.jedit.org/index.php?page=download
http://www.gnu.org/software/mit-scheme/
http://download.plt-scheme.org/
http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/products/download.html?product=firefox-3.0.11&os=win&lang=en-US

Ah, okay, I found one:
http://audacity.sourceforge.net/download/

But is it really so important?
- Mark