[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (c) does not equal "copyright"
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: (c) does not equal "copyright" |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:30:13 -0700 (PDT) |
Hans Aberg wrote:
> > The
> > copyright symbol “©” can be included if you wish (and your character set
> > supports it), but it's not necessary. There is no legal significance to
> > using the three-character sequence “(C)”, although it does no harm.
>
> There is nowadays no legal significance of any the above, as copyrightable
> material becomes automatically copyrighted without any indication thereof or
> registration (though local legislation may vary).
Hans,
I thought I heard that, but can you prove that this is the case
internationally, and/or can you cite your source for this?
- Mark
- (c) does not equal "copyright", Mark Polesky, 2009/07/17
- Re: (c) does not equal "copyright", demery, 2009/07/18
- Re: (c) does not equal "copyright", Hans Aberg, 2009/07/18
- Re: (c) does not equal "copyright",
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: (c) does not equal "copyright", Graham Percival, 2009/07/18
- Re: (c) does not equal "copyright", Hans Aberg, 2009/07/18
- Re: (c) does not equal "copyright", Hans Aberg, 2009/07/18
- Re: (c) does not equal "copyright", demery, 2009/07/19
- Re: (c) does not equal "copyright", Hans Aberg, 2009/07/19
Re: (c) does not equal "copyright", Graham Percival, 2009/07/27