[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how is NR F. "LilyPond command index" generated?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: how is NR F. "LilyPond command index" generated? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:05:43 -0700 (PDT) |
Graham Percival wrote:
> It's done with texinfo's index generation. All
> @funindex foo
> entries are collected and genereated into the index. Internally,
> our @funindex macro is expanded to @findex and @kindex.
>
> If you're wondering because you want to improve the readibility of
> the index, that would require patches to texinfo/makeinfo and
> texi2html. :( We've had a few requests for this, but it's
> outside our control.
No, I'm wondering because I updated the syntax with a new command
in a recent patch of mine:
Add dynamic script fffff; update docs.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=a905c95c63cffb9c551e599e0fa5bf1840bb737c
Will the new \fffff command automagically appear in NR F?
If not, I wonder how many other commands are defined but not
@funindex'ed?
- Mark