Re: Is this possibly a bug?

[David Kastrup]

Valentin Villenave <address@hidden> writes:

> 2009/7/30 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> But if the key signature is, say, G major, then a note f would be
>> printed with a natural accidental.  So "this rule never prints any
>> naturals" would appear wrong to me.
>
> While the part you quoted is obviously wrong, I think the full
> sentence is clear:
> "Unlike `dodecaphonic', this rule never prints any naturals. "

Huh?  The behavior is unlike `dodecaphonic', but that does not make the
second part right.

"this rule never prints accidentals consistent with the key signature"
or "this rule only ever prints accidentals deviating from/inconsistent
with the key signature".

-- 
David Kastrup