[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LilyPond concept glossary?

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: LilyPond concept glossary?
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 05:28:48 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 01:21:09PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/7/31 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > IMO this is more "main NR chapter" material.  Appendices are
> > generally tables and auto-generated material.  I could imagine NR
> > 6 being pretty much what it is right now -- essentially just
> > simply substitution macros -- and a NR 7 being for advanced
> > scheme.  (I mean, not \textPad #3.0 stuff, but for the amazingly
> > complex stuff that Mark's always doing)
> I hardly think this has anything to do with *notation* per se, i.e.
> _nobody_ ever needs to know what a smob is in order to engrave a
> score.

Really?  Nicolas doesn't need to know about grobs in order to do
all the fancy scheme stuff he uses in his operas?  (I assume that
"smob" was a typo... do we actually have something called a

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]