Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?

[Mark Polesky]

----- Original Message ----
> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>
> To: Mark Polesky <address@hidden>
> Cc: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>; address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:57:48 AM
> Subject: Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?
> 
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Mark Poleskywrote:
> >> They were an in-crowd joke at some point, but I think the joke
> >> has lasted long enough.  I approve of changes that bring
> >> regularity in this file naming scheme.
> >
> > Then I propose the following Dutch->English changes:
> >
> > feta-banier             feta-flags
> > feta-beugel             feta-braces
> > feta-bolletjes          feta-noteheads
> > feta-din-code           feta-dynamics
> 
> We had the -code files as a contrast to the feta-din{NUMBER}, which
> included the -code ones.

Is there a problem with "feta-dynamics"? The last feta-din{NUMBER}
was removed 5 years ago:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=90fac

And feta-din was removed 4 years ago:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=c17ec


> > feta-eindelijk          feta-rests
> > feta-haak               feta-brackettips
> > feta-klef               feta-clefs
> > feta-nummer-code        feta-numbers
> > feta-pendaal            feta-pedal
> 
> be consistent with plural vs singular.

I was just following the fet_begingroup strings.
Are you suggesting to change line 18 of feta-pendaal.mf from

fet_begingroup ("pedal");

to 

fet_begingroup ("pedals");

?

I'm not opposed to it, but that would entail a lot of other
changes, too. And what about "timesigs"? "accordions"?

- Mark