[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LilyPond strings and \markup
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: LilyPond strings and \markup |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:56:54 +0100 |
2009/8/16 Patrick McCarty <address@hidden>:
> I suspect this is because LilyPond treats "foo" and #"foo" the same in
> this isolated context.
I think that's correct: all strings are stored as scheme objects since
it simplifies memory allocation (they don't have to be deleted at the
end of their life thanks to Guile's automatic garbage collection), so
internally there's no difference between the two identifiers.
Regards,
Neil
- LilyPond strings and \markup, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/16
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Patrick McCarty, 2009/08/16
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Joe Neeman, 2009/08/16
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/17
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/17
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/17
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Joe Neeman, 2009/08/17
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Graham Percival, 2009/08/17
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/17
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Graham Percival, 2009/08/17
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, John Mandereau, 2009/08/18
- Re: LilyPond strings and \markup, Nicolas Sceaux, 2009/08/18