[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Progress indicator
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Progress indicator |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:54:30 +0100 |
2009/9/25 Michael Käppler <address@hidden>:
> Hmm... I'll try to introduce a --verbose mode that prints the time needed
> for each stage, so we can run a test suite and hopefully get to considerable
> defaults.
If my test runs are indicative of the average timings, then you might
as well junk all the stages apart from the last, since they only take
up a few seconds of the preprocessing time. Of course, that then
leaves the issue with the last stage stalling at 81%: it's not much
use as a progress indicator if 82 - 100% only takes a few seconds.
> Can you propose a good way how to set the constants in Lily or SCM code?
I suppose the easiest way is to introduce a program option which can
be set via -d (with a sensible default set in lily.scm).
Regards,
Neil