[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: neo-modern-voice?
From: |
Frédéric Bron |
Subject: |
Re: neo-modern-voice? |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:46:55 +0200 |
Here is my new proposal:
- the addition to scm/music-functions.scm uses standard indentation,
- I modified slightly the example for all automatic accidental styles
(the same for all), in particular added staff change,
- I modified the doc of translations accordingly.
Hope it is now OK.
Frédéric
0001-added-new-automatic-accidental-behaviours-neo-moder.patch
Description: Binary data
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Graham Percival, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Graham Percival, 2009/10/16
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/17
- Re: neo-modern-voice?,
Frédéric Bron <=
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/17
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Frédéric Bron, 2009/10/20
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Graham Percival, 2009/10/20
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/21
- Re: neo-modern-voice?, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/16