[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:54:48 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:21:16AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 00:21 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit :
> > Does the attached patch convince you to go on on Waf?
> Actually, please ignore my patch and checkout a SVN copy of Waf instead
> svn checkout && mv trunk waf
> then invoke waf-light from this checkout.

I'm already working from waf.  I did an svn update.  It still
fails the first time I run it, while working perfectly the second

In case there's any misunderstanding, I'm talking about the
dev/gperciva branch.  The minimal example that Thomas Nagy sent
works just fine.

1)  if you can't duplicate the problem after checking out
dev/gperciva, then I'll check a third time to see if there's any
old version of waf floating around on this machine.

2)  if you can duplicate it in dev/gperciva, then please either
fix the problem in my wscripts, or follow up with the waf people
(if you can extract another small example).

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]