[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serious doubts about waf
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:59:12 +0000

Ok, it seems the the key was to call
after adding it.

I'm off to a short conference tomorrow.  I expected to have internet
access, but when I mentioned it to one of the professors today, he
just laughed at me.  :(    so if I'm not around for a few days, that's

I'm going to work on
  1)  the waf build
  2)  merging the two init-pl files.
in the dev/gperciva branch.

I don't know how much time I'll have, but it's traditional for me to
do build system stuff at conferences.  I have no plans on touching
anything else, so if you're waiting for me to do anything, either do
it yourself or keep on waiting.

- Graham

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:21:16AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
>> Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 00:21 +0100, John Mandereau a écrit :
>> > Does the attached patch convince you to go on on Waf?
>> Actually, please ignore my patch and checkout a SVN copy of Waf instead
>> svn checkout && mv trunk waf
>> then invoke waf-light from this checkout.
> I'm already working from waf.  I did an svn update.  It still
> fails the first time I run it, while working perfectly the second
> time.
> In case there's any misunderstanding, I'm talking about the
> dev/gperciva branch.  The minimal example that Thomas Nagy sent
> works just fine.
> 1)  if you can't duplicate the problem after checking out
> dev/gperciva, then I'll check a third time to see if there's any
> old version of waf floating around on this machine.
> 2)  if you can duplicate it in dev/gperciva, then please either
> fix the problem in my wscripts, or follow up with the waf people
> (if you can extract another small example).
> Cheers,
> - Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]