[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nifty grid view of issues

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: nifty grid view of issues
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:13:33 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:04:10PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 11/27/09 2:29 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > After a bit of experimenting, I think this is the best way to view issues:
> >     
> >
> Yes, quite nice.  It's very helpful.  Thanks!

Also of note: items marked "Documentation" generally only need a
few sentences added to the docs.  We could probably close 5 of
these issues with half an hour of doc-editing... if anybody wanted
to touch the docs?

Remember folks, you don't need to compile anything to write+test

> > Note that anything in the High or Regression range stops 2.14 from
> > being released.
> 697 dates from 2.11, so we released 2.12 with it.  Do we want to hold up
> 2.14 for it?

Dunno.  There's also at least one item called "Regression: blah
blah" which isn't at Regression priority.  I was going to raise
this question in a few days, after everybody has had a chance to
delete all the issue update emails.  :)

> > BTW, my initial guess is that 787 could be fixed with less than 5
> > lines of scheme; I think some code is doing a simple comparison rather
> > than sorting through a list.
> Actually, this had nothing to do with it.  I'm not sure exactly why, but
> with the extra notes the outside-staff-priority was used instead of the
> script-priority.  And the outside-staff-priority was not set properly.


- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]