Re: PATCH: Issue 638 Autobeaming

[David Kastrup]

Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:

> On 12/17/09 9:53 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Of course, the results were quite different from what I half expected
>> to see.
>
> Yes.  That difference is due to a pre-existing bug in the code.  The
> consider_end check used the current duration, not the shortest
> duration in the beam.

That's one of the reasons why I dislike multiple responsible code paths
for the same task.  They make it easier for bugs to stay in the dark.
"No bugs in my kitchen."  "Did you check the crawlway?".

> That bug has now been fixed, and your example now beams the whole
> measure (as expected).  Patch update soon to arrive.

Well, at least that places my contribution above the level of mere
noise.  For now.

-- 
David Kastrup