Re: Autobeaming

[Carl Sorensen]

On 12/29/09 12:31 PM, "Hans Aberg" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 29 Dec 2009, at 03:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> 
>> Does this seem like a feasible architecture?
> 
> I think a system that determines the measure from the time signature
> is fundamentally flawed. I think n terms of a \meter that can be used
> to define the beaming structure. I substructure of that is summed up,
> and written as a time signature. If one has defined a set of such time
> signatures, then one can use that for a lookup.
> 

I believe that is what I am proposing.  Instead of trying to calculate
beatLength and measureGrouping from the time signature, we set them, along
with intended beamGrouping.  That way, the meter is determined by the user,
rather than inferred by the code.

Thanks,

Carl